Methodology

A disciplined path from signal to compounding results.

Data tells us where to act. The methodology turns those signals into infrastructure that executes faster, learns continuously, and compounds over time.

Working principle

Measure what matters to the decision.

We do not treat every prompt, platform or mention as equal. Priority comes from the intersection of high buyer intent, strategic fit and credible authority the brand can substantiate.

The approach combines repeatable review with informed judgement. AI outputs are variable, so findings are interpreted as directional evidence - not deterministic rankings or guaranteed outcomes.

Six stages

From executive context to continuous learning.

  1. 01

    Discover

    Align commercial priorities, buyer roles, decision moments, market context and operating constraints with senior stakeholders.

  2. 02

    Baseline

    Document what selected assistants currently say, where the brand appears, which sources recur and what material gaps exist.

  3. 03

    Prioritise

    Rank prompt opportunities and reputation risks by audience relevance, buyer intent, authority feasibility and potential decision influence.

  4. 04

    Architect

    Build a coordinated roadmap across entities, content, executive expertise, digital foundations and credible external authority.

  5. 05

    Activate

    Work alongside existing teams and partners to implement approved interventions with clear ownership and review controls.

  6. 06

    Learn

    Re-test the agreed question set, assess qualitative change and adapt as models, sources, buyer language and commercial priorities evolve.

What commercial outcome is this programme accountable for?

Align commercial priorities, buyer roles, decision moments, market context and operating constraints with senior stakeholders.

Inputs

  • Executive priorities and constraints
  • Target buyer roles and decision contexts
  • Confidentiality and approval boundaries

Outputs

  • Agreed commercial objective
  • Priority audience map
  • Governance framework

Stage 01

Discover

How do assistants currently interpret and recommend the brand?

Document what selected assistants currently say, where the brand appears, which sources recur and what material gaps exist.

Inputs

  • Priority question set
  • Target AI assistants
  • Competitive context

Outputs

  • Model-response baseline
  • Source-pattern analysis
  • Authority-gap assessment

Stage 02

Baseline

Which opportunities deliver the most commercial leverage?

Rank prompt opportunities and reputation risks by audience relevance, buyer intent, authority feasibility and potential decision influence.

Inputs

  • Baseline findings
  • Authority feasibility assessment
  • Strategic priorities

Outputs

  • Prioritised prompt universe
  • Risk mitigation plan
  • Quick-win opportunities

What infrastructure makes the brand easier to understand and recommend?

Build a coordinated roadmap across entities, content, executive expertise, digital foundations and credible external authority.

Inputs

  • Priority gaps from baseline
  • Existing content and authority assets
  • Team and partner capabilities

Outputs

  • Entity and content roadmap
  • Earned-authority agenda
  • Intervention ownership map

How do we execute with clear ownership and governance?

Work alongside existing teams and partners to implement approved interventions with clear ownership and review controls.

Inputs

  • Architecture roadmap
  • Team and partner capacity
  • Approval workflows

Outputs

  • Implemented interventions
  • Source and entity updates
  • Progress tracking

Stage 05

Activate

What changed, what worked, and where should we adapt?

Re-test the agreed question set, assess qualitative change and adapt as models, sources, buyer language and commercial priorities evolve.

Inputs

  • Baseline and intervention timeline
  • Current model responses
  • Market and priority shifts

Outputs

  • Updated baseline
  • Qualitative change assessment
  • Adaptation recommendations

Stage 06

Learn

Decision framework

Four dimensions keep reporting commercially grounded.

Presence

Does the brand enter relevant answers for the agreed question set?

Fit

Is it recommended for the buyer, need and context the brand is equipped to serve?

Accuracy

Does the answer reflect current facts, approved positioning and meaningful distinction?

Authority

Are owned and independent sources credible enough to support confidence?

Menchly Sentiment view showing score, trend and recent AI responses

Explore our services

Defined terms

Presence
Does the brand enter relevant answers for the agreed question set?
Fit
Is it recommended for the buyer, need and context the brand is equipped to serve?
Accuracy
Does the answer reflect current facts, approved positioning and meaningful distinction?
Authority
Are owned and independent sources credible enough to support confidence?

Frequently asked

A disciplined view of the practice

AI visibility is measured across four dimensions: Presence (whether the brand appears for high-intent questions), Fit (whether recommendations match the right buyer context), Accuracy (whether descriptions reflect current positioning), and Authority (whether sources are credible enough to support confidence). These dimensions form a baseline that can be tracked over time as models and priorities evolve.

Private AI visibility assessment

Start with a clear recommendation baseline

Establish how assistants interpret your brand today, which questions matter, and where infrastructure can improve speed, learning and compounding results.

Request a private assessment
Book appointment